0.00/0.08	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.09	% Command    : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM
0.08/0.28	% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
0.08/0.28	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.08/0.28	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.08/0.28	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.08/0.28	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.08/0.28	% CPULimit   : 1920
0.08/0.28	% WCLimit    : 240
0.08/0.28	% DateTime   : Wed Jul 30 02:06:34 EDT 2025
0.08/0.28	% CPUTime    : 
0.13/0.39	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.13/0.39	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NksXWgE1KF/E---3.1_16210.p
0.13/0.40	# Version: 3.0.0-ho
0.13/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.13/0.40	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.13/0.40	# Starting sh2lt with 960s (4) cores
0.13/0.40	# Starting new_ho_10_unif with 240s (1) cores
0.13/0.40	# Starting full_lambda_6 with 240s (1) cores
0.13/0.40	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 240s (1) cores
0.13/0.40	# Starting ehoh_best3_rw with 240s (1) cores
0.13/0.40	# sh2lt with pid 16288 completed with status 0
0.13/0.40	# Result found by sh2lt
0.13/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.13/0.40	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.13/0.40	# Starting sh2lt with 960s (4) cores
0.13/0.40	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.13/0.40	# Search class: HHUNF-FFSF21-SHHFFMBN
0.13/0.40	# partial match(1): HHUNF-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN
0.13/0.40	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 960 seconds (960 total)
0.13/0.40	# Starting new_ho_10 with 432s (1) cores
0.13/0.40	# Starting sh2lt with 97s (1) cores
0.13/0.40	# Starting new_bool_1 with 108s (1) cores
0.13/0.40	# Starting new_bool_2 with 108s (1) cores
0.13/0.40	# new_ho_10 with pid 16293 completed with status 10
0.13/0.40	# Starting new_bool_9 with 108s (1) cores
0.13/0.40	# sh2lt with pid 16296 completed with status 0
0.13/0.40	# Result found by sh2lt
0.13/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNHHA.
0.13/0.40	# Scheduled 5 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total)
0.13/0.40	# Starting sh2lt with 960s (4) cores
0.13/0.40	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,5,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.13/0.40	# Search class: HHUNF-FFSF21-SHHFFMBN
0.13/0.40	# partial match(1): HHUNF-FFSF11-SHHFFMBN
0.13/0.40	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 4 cores with 960 seconds (960 total)
0.13/0.40	# Starting new_ho_10 with 432s (1) cores
0.13/0.40	# Starting sh2lt with 97s (1) cores
0.13/0.40	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.13/0.40	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.13/0.40	
0.13/0.40	# Proof found!
0.13/0.40	# SZS status Theorem
0.13/0.40	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.13/0.40	thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType).
0.13/0.40	thf(decl_23, type, j: a > a).
0.13/0.40	thf(decl_24, type, g: (a > a) > a > a).
0.13/0.40	thf(decl_25, type, h: a > a).
0.13/0.40	thf(decl_26, type, f: (a > a) > a > a).
0.13/0.40	thf(decl_27, type, epred1_0: (a > a) > $o).
0.13/0.40	thf(decl_28, type, esk1_0: a).
0.13/0.40	thf(cEDEC_pme, conjecture, (![X1:(a > a) > $o]:(((X1 @ (g @ j))<=(X1 @ (f @ h))))<=(![X2:a, X3:a > $o]:(((X3 @ (j @ X2))<=(X3 @ (h @ X2))))&![X4:a > a, X5:a, X6:a > $o]:(((X6 @ (f @ X4 @ X5))=>(X6 @ (g @ X4 @ X5)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.NksXWgE1KF/E---3.1_16210.p', cEDEC_pme)).
0.13/0.40	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(((![X2:a, X3:a > $o]:(((X3 @ (h @ X2))=>(X3 @ (j @ X2))))&![X4:a > a, X5:a, X6:a > $o]:(((X6 @ (f @ X4 @ X5))=>(X6 @ (g @ X4 @ X5)))))=>![X1:(a > a) > $o]:(((X1 @ (f @ h))=>(X1 @ (g @ j)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cEDEC_pme])])).
0.13/0.40	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X13:a, X14:a > $o, X15:a > a, X16:a, X17:a > $o]:((((~(X14 @ (h @ X13))|(X14 @ (j @ X13)))&(~(X17 @ (f @ X15 @ X16))|(X17 @ (g @ X15 @ X16))))&((epred1_0 @ (f @ h))&~(epred1_0 @ (g @ j))))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])])).
0.13/0.40	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ~((epred1_0 @ (g @ j))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.13/0.40	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (f @ h)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.13/0.40	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a > $o, X2:a]:(((X3 @ (j @ X2))|~((X3 @ (h @ X2))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.13/0.40	thf(c_0_6, plain, ((g @ j)!=(f @ h)), inference(ext_sup,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4])).
0.13/0.40	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X2:a]:(((h @ X2)=(j @ X2))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_5])).
0.13/0.40	thf(c_0_8, plain, ((g @ j @ esk1_0)!=(f @ h @ esk1_0)), inference(neg_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.13/0.40	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ((h)=(j)), inference(pos_ext,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.13/0.40	thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a > a, X3:a > $o, X2:a]:(((X3 @ (g @ X4 @ X2))|~((X3 @ (f @ X4 @ X2))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.13/0.40	thf(c_0_11, plain, ((g @ j @ esk1_0)!=(f @ j @ esk1_0)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9])).
0.13/0.40	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a > a, X2:a]:(((g @ X4 @ X2)=(f @ X4 @ X2))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_10])).
0.13/0.40	thf(c_0_13, plain, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])]), ['proof']).
0.13/0.40	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.13/0.40	# Parsed axioms                        : 6
0.13/0.40	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 5
0.13/0.40	# Initial clauses                      : 4
0.13/0.40	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.13/0.40	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
0.13/0.40	# Processed clauses                    : 18
0.13/0.40	# ...of these trivial                  : 1
0.13/0.40	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.13/0.40	# ...remaining for further processing  : 17
0.13/0.40	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.13/0.40	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.13/0.40	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.13/0.40	# Backward-rewritten                   : 6
0.13/0.40	# Generated clauses                    : 16
0.13/0.40	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11
0.13/0.40	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.13/0.40	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.13/0.40	# Paramodulations                      : 1
0.13/0.40	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.13/0.40	# NegExts                              : 2
0.13/0.40	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.13/0.40	# Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.13/0.40	# Total rewrite steps                  : 7
0.13/0.40	# ...of those cached                   : 1
0.13/0.40	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.13/0.40	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.13/0.40	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.13/0.40	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.13/0.40	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.13/0.40	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.13/0.40	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.13/0.40	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.13/0.40	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.13/0.40	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.13/0.40	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.13/0.40	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.13/0.40	# Current number of processed clauses  : 7
0.13/0.40	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
0.13/0.40	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.13/0.40	#    Negative unit clauses             : 2
0.13/0.40	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
0.13/0.40	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
0.13/0.40	# ...number of literals in the above   : 1
0.13/0.40	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.13/0.40	# Current number of archived clauses   : 10
0.13/0.40	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
0.13/0.40	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.13/0.40	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.13/0.40	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
0.13/0.40	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.13/0.40	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 7
0.13/0.40	# BW rewrite match successes           : 5
0.13/0.40	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.13/0.40	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.13/0.40	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 621
0.13/0.40	# Search garbage collected termcells   : 162
0.13/0.40	
0.13/0.40	# -------------------------------------------------
0.13/0.40	# User time                : 0.006 s
0.13/0.40	# System time              : 0.001 s
0.13/0.40	# Total time               : 0.006 s
0.13/0.40	# Maximum resident set size: 1860 pages
0.13/0.40	
0.13/0.40	# -------------------------------------------------
0.13/0.40	# User time                : 0.009 s
0.13/0.40	# System time              : 0.005 s
0.13/0.40	# Total time               : 0.014 s
0.13/0.40	# Maximum resident set size: 1732 pages
0.13/0.40	% E exiting
0.13/0.40	% E exiting
0.13/0.40	EOF